TSTP Solution File: NUM688^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM688^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:56:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  10 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  139 (  16   ~;  11   |;   0   &; 106   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0   ^  27   !;   0   ?;  27   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    u: nat ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    more: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(satz22b,conjecture,
    more @ ( pl @ x @ z ) @ ( pl @ y @ u ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XPFcgbGUE7/E---3.1_26261.p',satz22b) ).

thf(n,axiom,
    ( ~ ( more @ z @ u )
   => ( z = u ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XPFcgbGUE7/E---3.1_26261.p',n) ).

thf(satz21,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X2 @ X3 )
     => ( ( more @ X4 @ X5 )
       => ( more @ ( pl @ X2 @ X4 ) @ ( pl @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XPFcgbGUE7/E---3.1_26261.p',satz21) ).

thf(m,axiom,
    more @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XPFcgbGUE7/E---3.1_26261.p',m) ).

thf(satz19h,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( ( X2 = X3 )
     => ( ( more @ X4 @ X5 )
       => ( more @ ( pl @ X4 @ X2 ) @ ( pl @ X5 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XPFcgbGUE7/E---3.1_26261.p',satz19h) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( pl @ x @ z ) @ ( pl @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz22b])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ ( more @ z @ u )
   => ( z = u ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[n]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( pl @ x @ z ) @ ( pl @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X19: nat,X20: nat,X21: nat,X22: nat] :
      ( ~ ( more @ X19 @ X20 )
      | ~ ( more @ X21 @ X22 )
      | ( more @ ( pl @ X19 @ X21 ) @ ( pl @ X20 @ X22 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz21])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ( more @ z @ u )
    | ( z = u ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( pl @ x @ z ) @ ( pl @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( ( more @ ( pl @ X2 @ X4 ) @ ( pl @ X3 @ X5 ) )
      | ~ ( more @ X2 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( more @ X4 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    more @ x @ y,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ( more @ z @ u )
    | ( z = u ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ z @ u ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X15: nat,X16: nat,X17: nat,X18: nat] :
      ( ( X15 != X16 )
      | ~ ( more @ X17 @ X18 )
      | ( more @ ( pl @ X17 @ X15 ) @ ( pl @ X18 @ X16 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz19h])])]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    z = u,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( ( more @ ( pl @ X4 @ X2 ) @ ( pl @ X5 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X2 != X3 )
      | ~ ( more @ X4 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( pl @ x @ u ) @ ( pl @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] :
      ( ( more @ ( pl @ X2 @ X3 ) @ ( pl @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( more @ X2 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : NUM688^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:37:36 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XPFcgbGUE7/E---3.1_26261.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # sh4l with pid 26375 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by sh4l
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # new_ho_10 with pid 26381 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 15
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 15
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 587
% 0.20/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 85
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------